- Platform for Economic Inclusion
- Preference Editing Tools Design
- Fluid Infusion
- Design Handbook
- Social Justice Repair Kit
This will get you 70% closer to an accessible website.
Why use semantic markup? Many assistive technologies, like screen readers, can leverage semantics of a webpage to provide better experiences. For example, instead of putting top level navigation in a <div>, a <nav> element will provide a landmark to a screen reader which will allow users to quickly navigate your site.
Why does HTML need to be clean? Simpler the markup, easier it will be for someone to use your site, and it will load faster too! Some typical scenarios are nested <div> containers which serve no real purpose except to provide a named selector for styling or scripting. If you don't need or use these selectors, remove them from your markup.
Many websites use dynamic content (i.e. content that changes or appears after the initial page load). While these effects may be desirable, it poses challenges for many users. Some common examples are image carousels, login "modal" dialogs, or status messages and notifications.
How dynamic content can cause problems:
In CSS sizing and positioning content and containers can be done in many ways such as using px, em, or rem. We suggest using rem units for CSS (and your CSS and themes should use it too).
Rem units is defined as: "Relative to font-size of the root element". This way you can specify a root font size of 16px, and by using rem units everywhere else, any changes to the root font size will scale your site accordingly.
Why use rem units?
Using rem units makes it possible for users to easily transformations and customization of your site to suit their personal needs. For example, if someone requires larger text because they want better legibility, all they need to do is change the root font size and everything resizes to fit automatically.
This article "Font sizing with rem" on Snook.ca explains why this is a good idea and how it can be done. There have been some counter-arguments to not use rem units recently (like this article "R.I.P. REM, Viva CSS Reference Pixel!"), but because we believe in user agency and personalization, we recommend using root-relative units.
Using root font relative sizing is one step toward the larger goal of more flexible, malleable, and robust web content. With the wide variety of devices, computers, and ways of accessing internet served content (i.e. via a browser, a mobile app, short message feeds etc.), the content you have should withstand different presentation modes and transformations.
Multiple Modalities and Formats
A good strategy for ensuring the content you create today is accessible in the future is to have your content stored and presented in alternative modalities and formats. For example, images or video can be accompanied by a caption or text transcript. This allows users with limited bandwidth or older devices access to your content even without the visuals. The text transcript also allows access for users with low or limited vision, and is more malleable for personalization (such as contrast modes, and different text presentation).
All-You-Can-Access Content Buffet
By providing your content in multiple formats and modalities, your users can choose how best to access and digest your content. Often by providing multiple modes of access, your content is more easily understood and retained. Care should be taken not to "overload" information. One strategy could be to provide ways to reveal additional content on-demand (such as a "Show Transcript" feature), this way the primary mode of access is presented initially and the secondary modes are accessed as needed.
Content Lost to Flash
The shift away from Flash as a rich web content format has resulted in valuable legacy content that is no longer accessible. A lesson learned from this scenario is to safe guard content by not relying on a single platform or format.
Many jurisdictions that have accessibility regulations for online content require WCAG 2.0 AA compliance (Also visit Government accessibility standards and WCAG-2 on PowerMapper) .
We often get caught up on WCAG 2.0 AA compliance and we lose sight of the bigger picture. A website may satisfy WCAG 2.0 AA criteria, but it does not necessarily mean that the website gives an enjoyable or usable experience, or that the website is inclusive, or takes into consideration conditions outside of the specification.
WCAG is baseline web accessibility, and is not the end of the journey for inclusion. For example WCAG does not cover many learner or cognitive differences.
Traffic laws do not teach a person to be a (good) driver. Similarly, WCAG compliance does not mean a website is inclusive or even usable by all persons.
Often in web development and design, we create content in the same way we would access it and making the assumption that everyone else will do the same. However, this is rarely the case as each individual has their own strategies for accessing, parsing, and consuming information.
Content on the web should have multiple paths that lead to it. This enhances discoverability and accommodates multiple strategies of access.
For example, a textbook may be accessed different ways even though it is the same material. One reader may choose to refer to the table of contents, another may prefer to skim the pages looking at diagrams and images, while yet another may jump to the index looking for a particular topic.
The navigation strategy should be cohesive and predictable so that users can easily get to where they need to every time they visit your site.
This same principle of multiple pathways can be applied to actual content itself. By providing your content in multiple formats and modalities, you can enhance comprehension, retention, and learning.
For example, a table of national census data could be represented multiple ways which compliment each other. A diagram representing the country with statistics, a textual analysis of the data, along with the table can benefit many more people than if you used just a table of data alone.
(Tweak this) In this section the term "nontraditional interactive web content" is used to describe when HTML elements and other technology are used to accomplish an interaction which is not possible using standard methods.
The challenge with nontraditional interactions is ensuring that someone using an assistive technology can perceive what is happening and have the necessary controls to accomplish the task.
Example: Flow Chart Web Application
A website has a drag-and-drop flow chart tool where the user can draw boxes, and arrows. For someone who is a sighted, mouse user this interaction wouldn't be much of a problem. But what if the user was not able to see the screen, or use a mouse?
Approaches to Dealing with Interactive Web Content
If the complex interactive is central to the experience and information, consider ways that the interactive can be adapted to other forms.