Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

This is the list of requirements identified in the first Stakeholder Workshop (Sept. 15-16, 2014) for the Online Educational Assessment application setting.

  • Personalized tool
  • Personalized assessment interface
  • Cognitively accessible discovery tools, clear language
  • Tweak in daily activities
  • Tweakable settings
  • Simplified dashboard with no metrics
  • Dashboard lite: settings, no metrics
  • Dashboard that fits current pref set used with main task
  • Interference to support enhancement
  • Revert settings based on (poor) performance (option)
  • Metrics feedback
  • Dashboard metrics combined with easy to set tool
  • Dashboard for settings + metrics
  • Teacher/student interface interactions
  • Teacher control panel and student interface
  • different individual and helper interfaces
  • 2 separate screens simul: student and teacher
  • Overseer control panel
  • Security and privacy
  • Privacy/security considerations
  • Interplay between "required prefs" vs "preferred prefs"
  • AT
  • Structure in line with existing assessment formats (and use vocab)
  • Other users sharing prefs
  • Allow/support sharing among peers
  • Do, pair, share
  • Pair sharing of prefs
  • Peer sharing
  • Peer sharing
  • Verify, be able to back out of poor choices
  • Eval whether or not a setting actually helps
  • Verify that the change actually helps
  • Assessing what prefs "help" vs "do no harm"
  • What about if a student selects a poor option?
  • Trial and Error
  • Ways to support engagement in assessment items
  • Real time evaluation of preferences, in context or supplied context
  • Opportunity to pratice and revisit if necessary
  • Authoring tool tied to preference tools
  • Real time, within task adjustments
  • Assess, auth to personalize trianing
  • Personalization (Bats)
  • Form has a function? - social aspect = private vs. public
  • Verify existing PNP
  • Varied starting points accomodated
  • Basic/default pref set
  • Import from standard format assessments
  • Tool input: expert analysis
  • Compatibility with IEP file format, terminology
  • Pre tool? Taken care of 1A of 2
  • Allow teacher to config based on known info
  • Can process existing prefs
  • Human n and p assistant
  • Layered n and p policy structure
  • tool input: existing assessment

 

  • Ongoing preference refinement (By student)
  • Sharing prefs/sets (dashboard <-> discovery tools)
  • Suggestions based on similar students peers!
  • No labels