Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

[10:36:50 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> Hey yura

[11:24:03 CDT(-0500)] <avtar> alexn, cindyli:

[12:10:14 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> michelled - I was wondering whether there was any likely connection between rich text inline edit and our OER commons work?

[12:11:21 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> Bosmon: probably not imminently, I'm afraid

[12:11:29 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> If I can be so bold as to speak for michelled (tongue)

[12:13:46 CDT(-0500)] <michelled> Bosmon: colinclark has spoken well for me (smile)

[12:14:30 CDT(-0500)] <michelled> Bosmon: we might use our simple inline edit but even that is looking unlikely since Andrey has already created something along those lines

[12:14:49 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> but is it accessible?

[12:14:52 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> (smile)

[12:15:38 CDT(-0500)] <michelled> anastasiac: what was your finding on adding a new heading using the table of contents? was it accessible?

[12:15:56 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> We sunk a lot of ARIA goodness into Inline Edit

[12:16:03 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> making me think that, someday, it might be quite helpful

[12:16:05 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> (wink)

[12:16:14 CDT(-0500)] <anastasiac> michelled, I was completely unable to get to the ToC using the tab keys

[12:17:14 CDT(-0500)] <michelled> well, simple inline edit integration might be on the table for next week then

[12:18:41 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> My mail from last night was probably too long to read, but I did notice one important designer-level issue, which was that our rich text editor seemed to apply "cancel on blur" rather than "commit on blur" that the simple inline edit did

[12:18:48 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> Was this something we did deliberately?

[12:19:52 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> Perhaps an issue for jameswy, if he can remember that far back

[12:22:03 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> I'm pretty sure jameswy would be the best to answer that question, yes, Bosmon

[12:36:28 CDT(-0500)] <jameswy> Bosmon: I'm confused.

[12:36:40 CDT(-0500)] <jameswy> As I recall, it should do neither commit nor cancel on blur.

[12:36:58 CDT(-0500)] <jameswy> (for RT inline edit)

[12:38:27 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> jameswy - thanks

[12:38:33 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> But the simple inline edit should?

[12:39:11 CDT(-0500)] <jameswy> Bosmon: Yes, on simple inlined edit, it should commit on blur.

[12:42:51 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> yura: You were asking about setup instructions for the GPII work. The page I've been writing is here:

[12:44:25 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> Bosmon: Remind me what our next steps are for getting yura's latest pull request in to the GPII repo?

[12:44:39 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> colinclark - I'm just reviewing it now

[12:44:49 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> Somehow it doesn't run for me, and I'm trying to find out why

[12:44:49 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> oh awesome!

[12:45:04 CDT(-0500)] <yura> Bosmon: how do you run it ?

[12:45:15 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> I feel like we should do more GPII chatting in the channel

[12:45:16 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> I just type node src/FlowManager.js

[12:45:19 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> either here or tech, whichever

[12:45:22 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> But the process exits silently

[12:45:25 CDT(-0500)] <yura> ya that doesnt work any more

[12:45:27 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> gah

[12:45:40 CDT(-0500)] <yura> Bosmon: what you need to do if ou want to run flow manager

[12:45:46 CDT(-0500)] <yura> just open node

[12:45:59 CDT(-0500)] <yura> actually

[12:46:15 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> like, just run the node executable?

[12:46:18 CDT(-0500)] <yura> just put back gpii.flowManager(); as the last line in flow manager

[12:46:24 CDT(-0500)] <yura> that's the easiest

[12:46:35 CDT(-0500)] <yura> flowManager is just a module now

[12:46:40 CDT(-0500)] <yura> so it does not start itself

[12:46:45 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> as a Node newbie...

[12:46:47 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> i'm curious

[12:46:48 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> Kindly update the for flowManager in your pull request (smile)

[12:46:52 CDT(-0500)] <yura> (smile)

[12:46:53 CDT(-0500)] <yura> sorry

[12:46:54 CDT(-0500)] <yura> i will

[12:47:05 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> Does it have some convention where it looks for a particular file in ./?

[12:47:06 CDT(-0500)] <yura> it is now intended to be run by linux repo

[12:47:09 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> or how does it know, yura?

[12:47:32 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> Well, this is sort of exposing the fact that we increasingly don't have tests

[12:47:38 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> it's a shame to lose the ability to even have manual tests

[12:47:51 CDT(-0500)] <yura> yes

[12:48:01 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> Could you add a test driver module back into universal?

[12:48:16 CDT(-0500)] <yura> back >

[12:48:17 CDT(-0500)] <yura> ?

[12:48:19 CDT(-0500)] <yura> it was never there

[12:48:22 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> "morally back"

[12:48:41 CDT(-0500)] <yura> colinclark: well if you have ./ in front f the file it assumes relative pass

[12:49:14 CDT(-0500)] <yura> if you dont have ./ in front it will be looking up a node module, core global or local

[12:49:30 CDT(-0500)] <yura> so withing node_modules directory (recursively) and up

[12:49:40 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> Clearly that line you mentioned doesn't belong in the flow manager module itself any more

[12:49:55 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> But it seems like universal could do with a test driver module to restore the manual test functionality it had before

[12:50:22 CDT(-0500)] <yura> Bosmon: yes I agree, do you mind ill add it once i focus on tests ?

[12:50:40 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> Well, I think we can't accept the pull request if the state of the repo is untestable

[12:50:43 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> I can add it myself

[12:50:58 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> Right now all it needs to do is issue that 1 line that you mentioned

[12:51:38 CDT(-0500)] <yura> ok ill add it ?

[12:51:42 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> cool

[12:55:01 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> yura: Okay, so you're saying that when you run the "node" command in the terminal...

[12:55:11 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> it will recursively scan and execute all modules in the node_modules directory?

[12:55:19 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> relative to where you ran the command from?

[12:55:26 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> Sorry if this is just a moronic question (tongue)

[12:55:48 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> if nothing else, i'm proving how un-733t i am

[12:55:49 CDT(-0500)] <colinclark> (smile)

[12:56:26 CDT(-0500)] <yura> colinclark: it will be looking up a node modules only when you call require, so when you do it will do it relatively to the file (node process) where require was called

[13:16:07 CDT(-0500)] <yura> Bosmon: i updated my pull request

[14:22:01 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon> michelled - I believe this one is the branch that can build the current videoPlayer integration

[14:22:02 CDT(-0500)] <Bosmon>

[14:30:16 CDT(-0500)] <michelled> thx Bosmon

[14:31:45 CDT(-0500)] <Justin_o> yura: can i use an invoker from the parent component as a listener for an event in a subcomponent?

[14:32:04 CDT(-0500)] <Justin_o> yura: can't remember if i can't use those just in the parents listeners or any specified in defaults

[14:32:24 CDT(-0500)] <yura> yes i think you can

[14:32:30 CDT(-0500)] <yura> not sure what happens to args though

[14:33:20 CDT(-0500)] <Justin_o> yura: okay.. thanks.. i'm getting an error that says ""

[14:33:23 CDT(-0500)]

<Justin_o> Object Error in listener record - could not resolve reference

Unknown macro: {exportPoller}

.handleResponse to a listener or firer. Did you miss out "events." when referring to an event firer? has no method 'fail' - {}

[14:34:24 CDT(-0500)] <yura> right well you subcomponent should be initialized some time in final init (on event) since parent's invokers are initialized after its subcomponents

[14:34:46 CDT(-0500)] <Justin_o> yura: oh i see (sad)

[14:34:49 CDT(-0500)] <Justin_o> thanks

[17:12:30 CDT(-0500)] <NickMayne> Hey Chaps

[17:12:42 CDT(-0500)] <NickMayne> Bosmon, gave you script a shot

[17:12:49 CDT(-0500)] <NickMayne> Looks like its partially working.

[17:16:24 CDT(-0500)] <NickMayne> It seems that if you edit one box, it works fine... but if you then proceed to edit another box you get this error that.deadMansBlur is undefined [Break On This Error] that.deadMansBlur.noteProceeded();

[17:28:17 CDT(-0500)]

<NickMayne> I think... that.deadMansBlur.noteProceeded(); needs to be if (that.deadMansBlur)

Unknown macro: { that.deadMansBlur.noteProceeded(); }

[20:03:01 CDT(-0500)] <travis_84> I am going to assume all the devs have logged out but i just wanted to introduce myself. Found out about this project through GSoC.

  • No labels